Edudialogue

The difference in the success of actions lays in the motivations behind them. The way of narrating the future purposes impacts on the possibilities of achieving them. In the following paragraphs will be exposed the difference between the dialogic repertoires of target reference and declaration of intents. It will be explained how using the first brings to success more easily than the second and how to use it. The repertoire of target reference consist in setting a goal/purpose in an objective and concrete way (Turchi). When a purpose is explicated, it becomes possible to trigger a path/movement in the discursive configuration to reach it. The fact that is leads to new narrations, turns the target reference into a generative repertoire with the dialogic weight of +0.2. The developments of the narration can be many: finding strategies, developing competencies, activating resource, ecc. In many researches had been pointed out that when workers have clear the goal of the agency, they a...

The strength trough which ideas are expressed affects the possibility of making further considerations or not. The expression of strong opinions, indeed, could inhibit the response of the interlocutor or worse and prevent the development of interesting conversations. On the other side, expressing ideas with a view opened on possibilities, can lead to interesting reasoning. It is matter of using in the narration the dialogic repertoire of opinion rather than the one of possibility. The repertoire of opinion consists in presenting a personal idea and assert its undisputable validity (Turchi). It encloses the dialogical process within the personal position of the speaker, which is not scientifically shareable. Moreover, this repertoire does not allow other realities freed from the anchorage to the personal position. For its closeness and circumscription within the personal dimension, it belongs to the class of maintenance repertoires . Its impact on the narration is really strong, so ...

The form of answering questions or making commentaries can really change the reaction of the interlocutor. From one side it is possible to get the interest of the other person and engage a stimulating conversation. On the other side there is the possibility of getting no answers or worse, evoke an aversive reaction. This is the difference in using the dialogic repertoire of specification rather than the one of commentary. The repertoire of specification consists in entering the merit of the topic to add some details (Turchi). The specification can be made in different ways: on shareable concepts (scientific concepts) or personal beliefs. If it is on the first one, the specification can bring to develop the conversation in new ways. This, in the dialogical approach , corresponds to the generative properties . If the added details rely on personal beliefs, it wiill hard for the interlocutor to make further considerations, and the repertoire will acquire maintenance properties . For this...

The Theory of Bablog also provides useful tools to become good leaders. By working on words , indeed, is possible to give instructions more efficiently. The efficacy is evaluated in terms of active and productive participation of the team members. The workers' narration of themselves can be boosted by the use of proposals, while orders can be managed both in a generative or maintenance/unproductive way. The dialogic repertoire of the proposal manifests when are configured possible and probable opportunities from the current situation. It offers new elements to the configuration that allow to increase the range of viable realities. In other words, it allows forecasting how the uncertainty of phenomena could manifest. From this is assigned to the interlocutor how to act. For the variability it gives to the narration , it belongs to the class of generative repertoires with the dialogic weight of +0.20. The dialogic repertoire of the ordinance configures a reality in terms of d...